OpenVPN has almost become synonymous with VPN clients and rightly so. It’s one of the fastest, most secure, and reliable VPN protocols out there. No matter which operating system you are on, most of the VPN clients have OpenVPN as their default tunneling protocol. Having said, there is talk of anOpenVPN alternativethat claims to bring better performance and is much easier to set up. Yes, I am talking about WireGuard. While WireGuard is relatively new, it holds a lot of promise and that’s why we bring you an in-depth explainer on OpenVPN vs WireGuard. In this article, we talk about their similarity and differences and take you through some important aspects of WireGuard. So without further delay, let’s begin.
OpenVPN vs WireGuard: A Brief Introduction
Now that we have learned about the basics, let’s move to the security aspect of OpenVPN and WireGuard.
When we talk about VPN protocols, security is treated as the top priority, hence, let’s begin with OpenVPN’s security first. Since OpenVPN has been here for so long,it has gone through many security audits and has been found secure and reliablewithout any glaring vulnerability. It has a CVE tracking mechanism where publicly known security vulnerabilities and exposures are reported and patched regularly. On the technical front, OpenVPN uses a custom security protocol based on SSL and TLS protocols. If you are unaware, TLS (Transport Layer Security) is one of the best cryptographic protocols which provides secure communication between two endpoints. In fact, this protocol is used by iPhones toshare filesthrough AirDrop.
Apart from that, OpenVPN utilizes OpenSSL which is a library of security protocols to identify other parties in the network and prevent eavesdropping. Another important security aspect of OpenVPN is thatit operates inuser space —a segregated space where virtual memory is protectedagainst rogue programs and attackers. All in all, OpenVPN is a pretty secure protocol and the company continuously develops new technologies to combat malicious attacks.
Talking about WireGuard, it uses SSH (Secure Shell) protocol to communicate between devices. It’s a cryptographic network protocol just like TLS that offers a great range of security features. But that is not all. Unlike OpenVPN which runs in a user space,WireGuard runs inside a Linux module called thekernel space. What it means is that all the operations happen inside the deep layer of kernel, away from the operating system. As a result, the operations remain quick and secure — even better than OpenVPN.
While encryption is part of security, we have mentioned it separately to emphasize on various algorithmic techniques used by OpenVPN and WireGuard. As I said above, OpenVPN utilizes a security suite called OpenSSL which providesa range of 256-bit cryptographic algorithms like AES, 3DES, BlowFishand more. The algorithms are so powerful that it can traverse through NAT servers andfirewallswithout breaking the connection.
Now we come to another important aspect of VPN protocols: Authentication. OpenVPN uses two ways to authenticate between parties in a network. One isCertificate-based authentication which is the most secure method, but it’s slower in executionand another is Pre-shared keys which is the fastest way, but relatively less secure. Depending on the network environment, OpenVPN uses either of the authentication methods, but you can choose your own configuration too for better security.Source: SoftEther
In this battle of OpenVPN vs WireGuard,the major difference between the two protocols is performance. The reason WireGuard is touted to be the VPN protocol of the future is that it offers almost 2X performance jump than what OpenVPN offers. And the reason is quite simple: unlike OpenVPN which runs as an application, WireGuard runs as a module inside the Linux kernel. So thecryptographic services are executed really fast while operating encryption or decryption processes. Apart from that, due to the deep integration with the kernel, there is not much layer to interact with which saves time significantly.
But that is not all. OpenVPN has 400,000 lines of code which is simply huge whereasWireGuard has just 4,000 lines in its codebase. If you know a bit of programming, you would know that a smaller codebase translates to faster performance. So, if you want to implement WireGuard in your private VPN, you are going to be surprised on the performance front.
OpenVPN is available everywhere includingWindows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, Windows Phoneand more. In fact, almost all the modern VPNs are based on OpenVPN protocol. We have covered thebest VPN for Windows,Android,iPhone, iPadandmacOSso check those lists too. Other than that, OpenVPN’s protocol is also used in many routers’ firmware for tunneling data packets in a secure method.
Coming to WireGuard, the VPN protocol is implemented in a few VPN clients and you can get them on Windows, Android, macOS, iOS and Linux. Some of those VPN clients are Mullvad, IVPN, and Tunsafe. However, in the coming months, when WireGuard will be released with Linux kernel,it will be natively available as a kernel module on allUNIX-likeoperating systems. And that includes Android, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, and Linux.
So at this point, WireGuard is nowhere near OpenVPN in terms of adoption and platform support. However, after the upcoming Linux kernel release and subsequent adoption by Google and Apple, many mainstream VPN clients likeExpressVPN and PIA may start implementing the WireGuard protocolin their apps.
So that was our deep dive into OpenVPN and WireGuard and in what ways they are similar or different in their approach. For a long time, OpenVPN has been the de-facto protocol not only for VPN clients but also for any kind of network tunneling be it in routers or network servers. However, WireGuard has come up with lots of promise in the performance and setup front. So now we will have to wait and see if VPN companies are adopting the WireGuard protocol or not. Anyway, that is all from us. If you found the article informative, do comment down below and let us know.
Passionate about Windows, ChromeOS, Android, security and privacy issues. Have a penchant to solve everyday computing problems.